If emissions fell, it was because something had gone wrong: the Great Depression, the Second World War, the energy crises of the 1970s, the collapse of the Soviet Union, the 2008 financial crash. ![]() If economic activity worldwide was growing, so were emissions. ![]() For almost 200 years starting in the late 1700s, when the widespread availability of coal powered the U.K.’s industrial revolution, countries that got rich did it by burning fossil fuels. To understand why many feel those are in conflict-even if they shouldn’t be-it helps to examine how modern life and the global economy became so tied to rising emissions. And that’s if they even meet those targets, which looks unlikely.Īs negotiators head into COP26, they’re trying to balance climate action with their countries’ economic interests. 26, found that current pledges would lead to a disastrous 2.6☌ average global increase in temperatures over the preindustrial era by 2100-well above the Paris Agreement’s target of limiting warming to 1.5☌. climate summit since 2015, the priority will be agreeing on how fast each country should cut its carbon emissions in order for the world to avoid catastrophic levels of climate change. When negotiators from almost 200 countries gather in Glasgow from Oct.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |